g-2.space Report : Visit Site

Technical data of the g-2.space

Geo IP provides you such as latitude, longitude and ISP (Internet Service Provider) etc. informations. Our GeoIP service found where is host g-2.space. Currently, hosted in United Kingdom and its service provider is Webfusion Internet Solutions .

the related websites

petecornish.co.uk g2contractors.co.uk g2-uk.com popupology.co.uk g2legal.co.uk g2digital.co.uk g2bs.com g2outdoor.co.uk g2speech.com 

HTTP Header Analysis

HTTP Header information is a part of HTTP protocol that a user's browser sends to called Apache/2.4.33 (Unix) containing the details of what the browser wants and will accept back from the web server.

DNS

HtmlToText

guccifer 2.0: game over we've seen deliberately placed "russian fingerprints", efforts to forge perceived association to wikileaks, dnc breach claims discredited, how guccifer 2.0 used "trump opposition research" like an identity card the day after it was cited by crowdstrike executives in a washington post article, noted how he could only ever seem to hack the dnc, lacked syntactical traits of a russian speaking english and has been shown as most likely operating within us timezones based on email timestamps, archive timestamps, twitter activity and wordpress activity. the list of "additional articles" are articles unique to this site. these provide further information showing how, why, where and when questionable apt28/29 attributions to guccifer 2.0 occurred (all were ultimately tenuous) as well as various other relevant topics. recent downtime & efforts to shut my site and my communications down by duncan campbell this site has been branded as "russian disinformation" by duncan campbell, someone who wrote an article for the intercept undermining the meeting between william binney and cia director mike pompeo . on november 14, i wrote an article critical of his and risen's article dismantling the framing and rhetoric used. it appears this may be one of the reasons that campbell, around that time, decided to embark on "investigating" (gathering materials he could use to try to harass, intimidate and smear) me and started stirring up distrust and paranoia where different parties were mutually investigating a shared interest (the falsity of the cyber-security elements of russiagate) . he did this by claiming that forensicator's edt observation was "false", claming that forensicator and myself are one person and making several misinerpretations of forensicator's work. the edt observation and numerous other things have been explained to him several times (as demonstrated in my responses to his emails) and he stubbornly refuses to respond to those and has persisted in looking for angles with which he can try to smear. i've recently tweeted about these, have exposed all his emails to me and my responses to them and am writing an article that goes through all the attack angles, the materials he intends or had intended to use and all communications to demonstrate just how misguided and aggressive campbell's efforts have been. please just challenge the evidence and arguments from this point onwards, trying to dox me is the opposite of engaging the research and discoveries in good faith. apologies to all for the downtime issues over the past week, some people can't take criticism it seems! note: i do not condone any harassment or abusive behavior towards campbell at all. please do not contact him on my behalf or as a result of his efforts against me. defia @ protonmail.com 340c 249a 8faa efc6 4bcb 5c2e 6fcd e104 d0b0 1fe2 update - june 2nd, 2018 by adam carter follow @with_integrity contents 1. introduction 2. timeline - what happened & when did it happen 3. guccifer2.0's claims debunked & discredited 4. 3rd party assessments - assumptions & conjecture vs evidence & facts 5. actions, consequences & convenience for anti-leak narratives 6. rushing to be russian - the donkey in a bear costume made a mistake 7. language & text analysis 8. recognizing intent from deceptions 9. with motive & means - those more likely linked to g2 than russians appendices additional articles 3rd party articles frequently asked questions (1) introduction there are individuals, who, in reality, now have a much higher likelihood of being linked to guccifer2.0 than anyone in russia. - the intention of this article is to inform readers extensively about everything there is to know about guccifer2.0 and from that, be armed with enough information to give motive and means the regard they deserve. to understand who guccifer2.0 could possibly be - it is imperative to understand what guccifer2.0 was. what did he do? what did he say? are his claims now confirmed, debunked or yet to be verified? what were the results of his actions? what do any lies told and the likelihood of them being debunked or remaining secret really imply about his intent? was there anything misreported or omitted that may have been relevant? the best way to get a clear picture of how incidents relate to each other and recognize suspect timing is to use a timeline - the timeline below was built using references to every unique piece of information directly relevant to guccifer 2.0 that i could find on public record (no matter whose narrative it supported - as should be fairly clear) . (2) guccifer2.0 timeline - what happened & when did it happen? (3) guccifer2.0's claims debunked & discredited before looking at intent, motive, conflicting evidence and more, it's important to become aware of a few key facts about guccifer2.0 and some of the claims he made. claim: hacked the dnc's servers - status: discredited guccifer2.0 stated in an interview with lorenzo franceschi-bicchierai (for motherboard / vice news) on the 21st of june, that he breached the server using a "0-day exploit of ngp-van". threatconnect, although still apparently unswayed from their assessment that guccifer2.0 is a collective of russians (we'll get on to that topic later in the article) - did report some very useful facts that serve to debunk guccifer2.0's claims. a) ngp-van is a cloud-hosted web-service separate from the dnc network, the claimed method of breach was discredted by threatconnect. - it was noted that phishing for credentials would be far more practical for exploiting such a service. b) he makes claims of lateral movement within the dnc network - but doesn't realize that his effort to match the reporting of crowdstrike falls down due to his own misinterpretation of that. - crowdstrike's report mentions lateral movement in terms of the "bear" infrastructure across the whole of the internet rather than movement within the dnc network - it looks like guccifer2.0 s trying to make claims that correlate with what he has inferred from crowdstrike's reportage. c) to quote threatconnect at the time (and nothing has been reported to contradict it since): " as it stands now, none of the guccifer 2.0 breach details can be independently verified ". claim: wikileaks source for dnc mails - status: not verified guccifer2.0 put considerable effort into trying to convince people he was the source for the dnc email leaks that ended up in the public domain on july 22nd. he outright claimed it, multiple times. he made a point of mentioning wikileaks in his purposeful destruction of his own reputation on october the 4th (a reference to his clinton foundation claims and the files he posted supposedly demonstrating the hack) and on october 18th showed he was trying to push a perception of being associated with wikileaks and responded to a wikileaks tweet as though it was intended for him personally (when it wasn't). going back to the 4th, the supposed "clinton foundation hack" - is also where his claim starts to show cracks. he stated "i can’t post all databases here for they’re too large. i’m looking for a better way to release them now.". why, if he was really the source for the dnc emails, would he be at all struggling to find a solution to get the data published? - why express this 73 days after the last large batch of data he claims to have acquired was successfully published through wikileaks? even putting seemingly contradictory statements aside - assange has implied that the emails were leaked, rather than hacked, in contradiction with guccifer2.0's claims and there is still nothing independently verifying guccifer2.0's claims. claim: hacked clinton foundation - status: discredited on october 4th, 2016 - guccifer2.0 claimed to have hacked the clinton foundation. he followed this up by posting an archive containing files that were all from previous leaks and from documents in the public domain. ultimately, he has ne

URL analysis for g-2.space

http://www.g-2.space//#10
http://www.g-2.space//#11
http://www.g-2.space//#12
http://www.g-2.space//5.doc
http://www.g-2.space///cf
http://www.g-2.space/cs2/
http://www.g-2.space/g2tweettimes/
http://www.g-2.space///chaos
http://www.g-2.space///cs
http://www.g-2.space///wapo
http://www.g-2.space///process
http://www.g-2.space//4.doc
http://www.g-2.space//1.doc
http://www.g-2.space///un
http://www.g-2.space//dms/f4t.html

Whois Information

Whois is a protocol that is access to registering information. You can reach when the website was registered, when it will be expire, what is contact details of the site with the following informations. In a nutshell, it includes these informations;

Mistakes

The following list shows you to spelling mistakes possible of the internet users for the website searched .